I have posted several times on the issues surrounding babies and church-going (the latest is here). Recently, a comment was added, reading,
I hear your stated needs, but I just wanted to say that a cry room doesn’t seem to me to be any better than having a recording of the service played at home. There is no opportunity for you to sing, haul out your Bible and read, greet, and share in communion when you’re behind glass or in another room. I just can’t see how this is teaching kids anything…
Forgive me for being so forward, but I say let the nursery and children’s church workers teach your kids in those “age appropriate ways”. Your baby doesn’t want to be in church. He wants to play on a floor somewhere. Let him. And let the other people worship uninterrupted.
Church is supposed to be a family, too, and that family deserves the chance to be together, focused, for just one hour a week, don’t they? That’s hard to do with babies crying and children making even innocent disruptions. Satan will use any distraction he can to get people away from hearing the word, even perfectly innocent ones.
I just wanted to put out a counter argument here. It’s a hard, gutwrenching issue for some people, and my heart goes out to you.
Since this seems like a reasonable person’s thoughts, but also seems to be entirely missing my point, I thought I would take this opportunity to explain some of my ideas further.
Let me break it down and address some of the points individually.
… a cry room doesn’t seem to me to be any better than having a recording of the service played at home. There is no opportunity for you to sing, haul out your Bible and read, greet, and share in communion when you’re behind glass or in another room. I just can’t see how this is teaching kids anything…
There are several important distinctions between a cry room and a CD played at home (or walking the halls, as we currently do, for that matter):
- First of all, you would presumably go into the service, sing, read, participate – and help children learn to do so. Only if a small child was unable to stay would a strategic retreat to the cry room be called for. You could also return if the issue was resolved, the child fell asleep, etc.
- With the sevice piped in, and possibly with video feed or a view through glass, we can absolutely sing and worship! (And teach the kids to do so).
- We get to greet and visit with other church members before and after service. After all, you shouldn’t be doing that during service, anyway!
- Communion would be given to those in the cry room who felt they were able to be ready – just as the elements are taken to the Pastor and the pianist.
- The children are learning more than you imagine – Simply getting up Sunday morning and getting dressed up and out the door. The fact that Mama and Papa love and respect God enough to go through whatever it takes to worship Him in His house on the Sabbath. Sitting quietly through service (see my first point). Hearing the music, singing the songs (see above), praying corporately.
Okay, I’m sure I could list some more, but let’s move on…
I say let the nursery and children’s church workers teach your kids in those “age appropriate ways”.
I adore and admire the people who serve in the nursery and teach Children’s Church. And once my kids are comfortable staying in either one, I welcome them doing so.
Jewel, at 4, goes into Sunday School at 9 am and we pick her up after service at noon. They transition them straight from Sunday School classes to Children’s Church, and everything is wonderful.
But I was charged by God, personally, with training up my children (I say “I” here because I am writing this alone, but this is a conviction shared, prayed over, and championed 100% by my husband). I do not send them to Day Care or Preschool during the week, for the very reason that I do not choose to abdicate my God-given responsibility for shaping their values and character, as well as educating them.
We do not find evidence in the Bible that nursing babies should be forcibly kept away from their mothers. Even in the Old Testament where we see a very young child taken to the Temple for a life of service there, he stayed with his mother until weaning (probably age three or four). A little research into psychology’s Attachment Theory, and the whole Attachment Parenting movement, shows that even secular science recognizes this bond.
Your baby doesn’t want to be in church. He wants to play on a floor somewhere. Let him. And let the other people worship uninterrupted.
Church is supposed to be a family, too, and that family deserves the chance to be together, focused, for just one hour a week, don’t they? That’s hard to do with babies crying and children making even innocent disruptions. Satan will use any distraction he can to get people away from hearing the word, even perfectly innocent ones.
Exactly. That’s why I need a cry room!
I absolutely want to keep the baby from disrupting the service.
But should my husband and other children not go to Sunday School because there is no place for me to go with the baby? Should all four of us miss out on church altogether? Don’t we deserve the support of our brothers and sisters so that we can worship and study together, too?
Worship should also be far more than one hour a week. My old pastor always used to say, “It takes tree to thrive” – three church services a week, in addition to your daily quiet time in the word, your family devotional time, your service time, and your prayer “without ceasing.” Maybe if you’re doing more, you don’t feel as “deprived” if for a few seconds there is a distraction?
I would also ask you to run that sentiment through a WWJD filter.
Would you not welcome into your church the mentally disabled man who sings at the top of his lungs, off-key? Or the homeless man, who smells offensive to you?
On second thought, this WWJD Filter opens up a whole avenue of discussion which I would like to table for a folow-up post.
Stay Tuned!